How to help
Our Mission: To make the world a better place
 
  White Moose - A Canadian Tradition

 

DISCUSSION FORUM NOW OPEN!!!

B

By way of signing this petition, you are indicating that it is your desire to have moose, which are white, removed from the hunting roster in Ontario. y wa y

 

Thank you 1stcom.com for hosting our site pro bono...

 

 

 

These pics were taken in June 2005 .... approximately 3 miles to the east of Oswald lake. The area is midway between Timmins and Chapleau. Imagine a cigarette filter ... and now imagine that as the earth ... For the first several hoots on the cigarette, the filter protects the smoker .. Eventually the filter leaches ... And then for a long time after, the filter continues to leach ...
So even if we cleaned up our act today ... the filter would still leach for decades .... if not centuries....   How is it possible that we really NEED to use herbicides in this case? Given that there are so many unemployed in the North ... who could manually graze or guide grazing animals ...
How can lumber companies claim that they comply with the Ontario Pesticides Act?

Pesticides Act
R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.11
http://192.75.156.68/DBLaws/Statutes/English/90p11_e.htm

Relevant sections following ....

Licences and permits: issue, renewal and revocation 11(3) The Director may refuse to issue or may cancel a permit, may impose terms and conditions in issuing or after issuing a permit and may alter the terms and conditions of a permit that has been issued where the Director is of the opinion, upon reasonable and probable grounds, that,
11(3) (c) there is or is likely to be danger to the health or safety of any person; 11(3) (d) there is or is likely to be harm or material discomfort to any person; 11(3) (e) there is or is likely to be impairment of the quality of the environment for any use that is being or is likely to be made of it; 11 (3) (f) there is or is likely to be injury or damage to any property or to plant or animal life;
11(3)(g) any property or plant or animal life is or is likely to be rendered directly or indirectly unfit for use by humans; 11(3) (h) a different method of control or extermination will or will likely be substantially as effective as the proposed extermination for which a permit is required under section 7 and will or will likely cause less impairment of the environment, if any, for any use that is being or is likely to be made of it or less harm to or adverse effect, if any, on any plant or animal life, humans or property; or 11(3) (i) the use of the pesticide will not be or will not likely be effective or necessary to carry out the extermination. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.11, s. 11.
    Yes .. the grey is death .. Herbicides from above .... Probably Vision herbicide ... Vision = Round UP
      Vision and frogs don't agree ....
       
    11(3) (i) the use of the pesticide will not be or will not likely be effective or necessary to carry out the extermination. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.11, s. 11. 11(3) (i) the use of the pesticide will not be or will not likely be effective or necessary to carry out the extermination. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.11, s. 11.
  11(3) (i) the use of the pesticide will not be or will not likely be effective or necessary to carry out the extermination. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.11, s. 11. 11(3) (i) the use of the pesticide will not be or will not likely be effective or necessary to carry out the extermination. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.11, s. 11. 11(3) (i) the use of the pesticide will not be or will not likely be effective or necessary to carry out the extermination. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.11, s. 11.
       

WANT A COUPLE OF THESE PICTURES FULL SIZE & CLEAN? Email Joel@WhiteMoose.Ca

Site last updated 10-27-2005 FAQ /email: info@whitemoose.ca
Copyright © 2004 Joel Theriault. Some Rights Reserved. Please send photo's to Pictures@WhiteMoose.ca